• jeremy.wade.morris       academic       music       podcast       contact.link

jerdotcom

words

3.31.2007

I Can't Believe it's Not Advertising

One of the most interesting aspects about YouTube's rise and ensuing attempts to become a legitimate service has been the way individuals and institutions have incorporated the site into their marketing plans.

Independent bands looking for ways to get the word out have turned to the site as a place to publish music videos. Although The Arcade Fire probably doesn't need much more publicity these days, it is significant that they used YouTube to share the first sounds from Neon Bible. The clip is a tongue in cheek anti-ad, but it's an ad nonetheless. The band knew the low-budget clip would be worth the price they paid for it versus anything they could have sent to Much Music.

Then there's the not-so-independent bands that are trying their best to look independent. YouTube is the ultimate venue to show off an amateur aesthetic, despite how many professionals may be behind the scenes. I was sent this video by email. Like most videos I receive, it came with little context. "Check this out, it is awesome." It is an impressive and seemingly spontaneous subway station performance of Phil Collins' "In the Air Tonight". A bit of digging, however, shows that the band , Naturally Seven, is a SonyBMG artist and that the video is part of a massive multimedia campaign to launch the single and the band's debut album. The video's credibility rests on the assumption of spontaneity. On YouTube, it appears as any other user video would appear, bringing even further assumptions about it (i.e. that this is something someone captured in the Paris metro station, though it was cool and uploaded it).

Perhaps the best example of what I am getting at here is the bride freak out video that garnered millions of views before the hoax was up. It turns out the video was what advertisers call a "net seed", the precursor for a shampoo ad campaign. The problem with these types of clips is not that they are intentionally deceptive. It's that they destroy the credibility of the social networks on which they depend. Advertisers want to be where the viewers are, but trying to sneak in through back doors does more damage than good. MySpace users are now inundated with friend requests from Fox TV show characters.

As marketers invent new ways to reach their target through social networks, their biggest challenge will be not to destroy the very environments they hope to tap. Otherwise, they'll end up like TV or Radio, media that users are increasingly leaving out of frustration. It might be good if marketers heeded the honest simplicity of Montgomery's Flea Market. Unless of course I've been duped and this is actually the first single of this guy's new album.

Labels: Marketing, Music Video, YouTube

posted by wade at 10:15 AM

2 Comments:

Anonymous mark raheja said...

good post. the more advertisers think about *why* people are migrating from television to the internet, the better off all of us will be. there is some progress, however small [and accidental], in the evolution of web metrics & analytics. it's a subtle shift, but the effective death of the page view is significant. old advertising has been all about impressions - about maximizing the # of eyeballs that see the ad. now, there is at least a fair bit of dialogue happening within the industry about what constitutes better metrics...talk of some kind of holy grail called 'the engagement metric'. we'll never lose the eyeball seekers...but hey, it's early in all of this stuff. we're seeing private gated communities [of homes] springing up in parts of the world...that regulate the media & advertising that goes on inside those communities. the same will happen online....but when it comes to openness online, you can't have it both ways. if youtube is going to be that place, the world's piazza of online video, then that means taking the good with the bad. perhaps we should just rely on the power of the collective. what if everytime an ad was posted to youtube, it was tagged as such...and you could filter your youtube search preferences to exclude that tag? hmmm...but then what about the awesome ads? what about honda's cog/wheel ad...or sony's bouncy ball ad? thoughts. thoughts.

7:49 AM  
Blogger wade said...

I agree that page views is a ridiculous metric. An engagement metric might be interesting, but depends on how its deployed. Engagement with the site that users are interested in? Or with the brand that marketers (and maybe some users) are interested in?

Taking the good with the bad sounds a bit defeatist...If people are committed to the shape of an environment, they can work it out. Take KEXP for example. Sure, it relies on member donations, but the result is an amazing user environment. The ads that do appear are sparse, local and relevant. They take care not to upset the balance.

Tagging ads as ads is a start. Technologies that allow users to bypass them completely (like PVRs in the TV world) will undoubtedly also develop. In the end, a legit business like YouTube could never endorse those measures and hope to stay in business. That's why advertisers should concentrate on making ads (sure, like the ones you mentioned) that are decent enough that people will want to watch them even if they realize they are ads. Then they can use new media to share these with *willing* viewers. At the very least, stop ruining the credibility of social networks with deceptive ploys.

11:03 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

  <$BlogBacklinkTitle$>  
<$BlogBacklinkSnippet$>
posted by <$BlogBacklinkAuthor$> @ <$BlogBacklinkDateTime$>

Create a Link

<< Home

previous posts

  • PuckCasts
  • Indie Aesthetics
  • Song in my Head
  • Holiday Wishes
  • Give Yourself a Pat on the Back
  • Comprehensive
  • Owen Pallett: Pole Star
  • Cheating on Myself
  • Splitting Genres
  • Playlists and Podcasts